patching...
Update: Spread the word about Pine-Richland Patch in the community! Follow us on Twitter and on Facebook at www.facebook.com/PineRichlandPatch »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Pine-Richland School Board to Pay $15,000 for Consultant in Search for Superintendent

Superintendent Dr. Mary Bucci's contract will not be renewed when it ends June 30.

 

The Pine-Richland School Board voted unanimously Monday to pay $15,000 to the Pennsylvania School Board Association for consultation services in the search for a new superintendent.

The services include advertising, recruiting, reference checks, as well as selection and screening assistance.

The current superintendent, Dr. Mary Bucci, will not be retained when her contract expires June 30, the board decided in a split vote in October.

"Administrator/Superintendent Search Services work with (a) school district, from start to finish, in seeking candidates for administrative or superintendent positions," according to the PSBA website.

"However, we are not a head-hunter search firm that 'places' candidates. Our philosophy has been, and always will be, that successful hires are selected locally—not by a consultant."

The PSBA services also include a guarantee that if the appointed superintendent leaves for any reason within one year, the search will be conducted again for a charge of 25 percent of the original fee.

Please help us get to 1,000 Facebook “likes” by clicking here and “liking” us.

 

Related Topics: Dr. Mary Bucci, Pine-Richland School Board, Pine-Richland School District, and Pine-Richland Schools Superintendent Search

Alan

12:26 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Dear PRSD -

It is amazing you have funds for this. Why can't you generate the same funds to find an Autism Support teacher for Eden Hall that has been absent for numerous weeks?

AGAIN, you validate your desire to bankrupt the less fortunate.

The reputation of this district is so bad whoever comes here has an uphill climb...GOD BLESS THEM & OUR CHILDREN

Reply

Richland Parent

4:20 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

OMG!!! The district is spending this much money on this when the middle school is in the stone age when it comes to computers. There aren't enough and the ones that do work take forever to load according to my kids. Where is this money coming from? I'm sure there is no line item for this in the current budget.

Reply

crosbycat

9:36 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

They spent $6000 for a consultant 5 years ago to find Mary Bucci who was already on staff. Maybe they will find someone good this time by spending more...

Such a racket! Taking hard earned taxpayer money for this farce of a search. This is possibly the most important job of the school board and they farm it out.

Reply

SSB

2:50 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Hearing a rumor that Dr Bucci resigned at Monday's board meeting. Can anyone confirm?

Reply

Cindy Cusic Micco

4:57 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

I was at the school board meeting and nothing was said about a resignation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SSB

5:35 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Thanks for setting that straight.

Tripitapodria

8:22 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Ridiculous. You've got to be kidding! "Stupid is as stupid does." Wish the parents of the district had a say in this. This board is a laughing stock of the community.

Reply

crosbycat

9:24 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Here is another problem with having PSBA perform the search. According to this article in the Scranton Times-Tribune dated August 5, 2012 ( http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/education-degree-no-longer-needed-to-be-school-chief-1.1354558), there is no longer a requirement for PA Superintendents to have education degrees. This opens the pool of candidates considerably, and considering the budget of public schools is comparable to a large corporation, a good option. However, the PSBA opposes this change. Does anyone think the PSBA will even consider candidates who are outside their box?

Reply

PineRichlandInformed

10:20 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Thanks for the link, Crosby.

I think the the Scranton Times-Tribune answered your question.

"Tom Templeton, an assistant executive director for the Pennsylvania School Boards Association, sees the legislation as a positive move. "I think it can be a real benefit to a school district," he said."

And who is Tom Templeton? Well, a simple Google search of the PSBA website reveals that he "..oversees the association’s comprehensive policy services ...and PSBA’s administrator search services."

So he's actual THE PSBA official responsible for overseeing superintendent searches? Wow.

That took me all of about three minutes to figure out. It probably helps if you actually read the articles you reference. Makes me wonder what else you didn't quite read completely before you formed you opinions.

As far as the cost goes, Triptapadria, you and Crosby are the only ones looking stupid here if you think that is a lot of money to pay for an executive search.

The Patch could be a great forum for interesting debate and discussion, but not as long as ignorance and inability to grasp even the most basic facts are so endemic among frequent posters such as yourselves.

Reply

crosbycat

8:53 am on Friday, November 30, 2012

My bad. It says "Superintendents across the state are not pleased with the new rules". I'm glad at least someone read the link.

And you are rude in your attempt to squelch the views of people who think PRSD and the school board are wasteful and incompetent.

Reply

Leave a comment