patching...
Update: Spread the word about Pine-Richland Patch in the community! Follow us on Twitter and on Facebook at www.facebook.com/PineRichlandPatch »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

How Have Pine-Richland's SAT Scores Fared Over the Years?

The Pennsylvania Department of Education compiles average SAT scores dating back to 2001.

 

The 2012 SAT scores for Pine-Richland High School ranked in the Top 10 for the Pittsburgh region for 2012, but how has the high school fared in the past?

Is there are trend?

Pine-Richland Patch compiled this list, using information from the Pennsylvania Department of Education website.

2001-2012 SAT Scores from Pine-Richland High School

Year Number Verbal Math Writing
Tested Average Average Average
Score Score Score
2012 331 543 561 535
2011 295 546 571 533
2010 289 544 568 532
2009 285 532 555 530
2008 295 542 565 532
2007 299 525 546 518
2006 268 524 550 515*
2005 260 527 540
2004 272 523 541
2003 250 520 541
2002 230 515 538
2001 223 520 526

* 256 students took the writing test compared to 268 who took the verbal and math tests.

 

Each section of the SAT is scored on a 200- to 800-point scale, with 800 being a perfect score, according to the College Board, which administers the test.

__________________________

Please help us get to 1,000 Facebook “likes” by clicking here and “liking” us.

Check out some of today's other top stories here.

 

Related Topics: Pennsylvania Department of Education, Pine-Richland High School, Pine-Richland SAT Scores, and SAT Scores

Dr. PR

9:53 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I think this chart begins to tell a pretty good story about our district. I haven't done a complete analysis, but at the highest level, with a 50% increase in students in the district, our kids have scored about 5% higher on *average*. That is a pretty nice statistic given this was done with dramatic growth in the student and teacher population. In the end, I think kudos go to our teacher and administrators, and to our kids and parents. Definitely on the right path.

Reply

Leave a comment